Search for: "Chrysler Corp Claims" Results 81 - 100 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 12:09 pm by John Lewis
  CompuCredit Corp. held that because the Credit Repair Organization Act was silent on whether claims could be arbitrated, the FAA mandated that the arbitration agreement be enforced. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Daimler Chrysler Corp. 269 F.3d 439 (4th Cir. 2001), PLIVA’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ fraud by concealment claim is DENIED. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:21 am by Andrew Frisch
As a consequence, unlike the federal statutory claims at issue in Morrison, Daimler–Chrysler, and Ray, shortening the statute of limitations for an FLSA claim necessarily precludes a successful plaintiff from receiving full compensatory recovery under the statute. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Chrysler Corp., 261 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2001), and held that even in the absence of class certification, the language of the statute that provides the authority for an award of attorney’s fees determines whether the attorney’s fees are attributed solely to the named plaintiffs or allocated on a pro rata basis to all class members. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Chrysler Corp., 261 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2001), and held that even in the absence of class certification, the language of the statute that provides the authority for an award of attorney’s fees determines whether the attorney’s fees are attributed solely to the named plaintiffs or allocated on a pro rata basis to all class members. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The investigation is based on an October 21, 2011 complaint and a November 8, 2011 letter supplementing the complaint filed by Beacon Navigation GmbH of Switzerland alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain automotive GPS navigation systems, components thereof, and products containing same that infringe one or more claims of U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:43 am by Sean Wajert
Chrysler Corp., 150 F.3d 1011, 1019-20 (9th Cir. 1998), stressed that commonality under Rule 23(a)(2) only requires there be some common issues of fact. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:16 am by Donna Eng
  However, when such a claim is raised, the employer may invoke the Ellerth/Faragher affirmative defense. [read post]