Search for: "Church v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 2,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2014, 6:01 am by Maya Angenot
As stated by the majority, the outcome hinged squarely on whether Westboro’s speech was of public or private concern, as public speech in the United States is granted almost untouchable protection. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:38 am by Harold O'Grady
For many years, religious denominations in the United States have been largely exempt from paying taxes. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:12 am
Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:13 pm
United States, 136 U.S. 1 (1890). on the basis that the beliefs and practices of the Mormon Church were incompatible with US Law.Could the same thing happen to Religious Organisations which disagree with same-sex marriage ? [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Americans United reported Monday that a Massachusetts state trial court has denied a preliminary injunction in Caplan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
George (McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Princeton University; Nootbaar Honorary Distinguished Professor of Law, Pepperdine Caruso Law School; Google Scholar): After the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:21 am by Howard Friedman
United States, (Docket No. 10-648, cert. denied 3/21/2011) (Order List). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:42 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
The petition of the day is: The Falls Church v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s note: This post is republished with permission from the RLUIPA Defense blog which can be viewed here: http://www.rluipa-defense.com/home.cfm The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida has denied the City of Jacksonville’s motion to dismiss Church of Our Savior’s (formerly known as Resurrection Anglican Church) RLUIPA suit, and has scheduled the case for trial. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
This argument failed, the Court stated, because it conflated financial self-dealing with usurpation of a corporate opportunity, with only the latter having been plead and argued on appeal.The Court then examined the church's claim under the standard set forth in Dixon v. [read post]