Search for: "City & County of Honolulu v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2021, 1:38 pm by Doug Cornelius
Aug. 20, 2019) (purchase of multiple properties in Wayne County, MI); United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:22 pm by Kalvis Golde
City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii 23-947Issue: Whether federal law precludes state-law claims seeking redress for injuries allegedly caused by the effects of interstate and international greenhouse-gas emissions on the global climate. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:36 am
City and County of Honolulu, the court held that to determine whether the legislature had a rational basis for distinguishing between the state and the counties regarding the limitations period for tort claims, evidence of rationality is determined by the record. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
City & County of Honolulu, No. 06-15337 In an action raising the issue of whether the Constitution imposes any limit on the City of Honolulu's power to repudiate a contract to convey property to a private citizen in connection with its leasehold conversion program, summary judgment for the city is vacated and remanded where: 1) contrary to the ruling below, the heightened scrutiny test of U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – On Heels of Ridley-Thomas Indictment, LA County Hires Firm to Launch Sweeping Audit Los Angeles Daily News – Ryan Carter and City News Service | Published: 2/4/2022 Los Angeles County hired the law firm Covington & Burling to conduct the audit of its contracting policies and processes and review all its major service contracts. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:48 pm by Courtney
City and County of Honolulu, 119 Hawai’i 90, 106 (Hawai‘i, 2008) citing Office of Hawaiian Affairs v Hous. [read post]