Search for: "City & County of S. F. v. Superior Court" Results 81 - 100 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Despite well-reasoned requests for depublication made by the City of Los Angeles, the California Building Industry Association (CBIA), the California State Association of Counties (CSAC) and the League of California Cities (League), the Second District’s questionable and controversial decision in Stopthemillenniumhollywood.com, et al. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The former New York mayor logged a decade with the law and lobbying firm then known as Bracewell & Giuliani and a two-year stint after that with Greenberg Traurig. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed September 6, and later ordered published on October 7, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial courts judgment denying plaintiff groups’ writ petition challenging Sonoma Countys use permit and related mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a winery project in the Countys rural Knights Valley area. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
" At a court hearing held before Kearney was ever notified, RI Superior Court Judge Susan McGuirl issued a temporary restraining order requiring the removal of any and all references to Narcisi from Kearney's website and all other "associated" sites. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:57 am by Caroline Lee
(f) & (g) [stating that county charters shall provide for “[t]he fixing and regulation by governing bodies, by ordinance, of the . [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, B292416 (Opinion filed 4/16/19). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
” However, the bankruptcy court later determined that since the tax refund came from the non-debtor’s earnings, it was the non-debtor’s solely managed community property. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am by MOTP
With respect to Propel, the trial court awarded Propel $14,173.67 for "delinquent base tax" for the 2003-2007 tax years, $10,477.25 for "penalty & interest," and $6,304.22 for attorney's fees. [read post]