Search for: "City and County of San Francisco v. Post" Results 81 - 100 of 477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2008, 11:09 am
City and County of San Francisco that such a rule is "mistaken" due to its lack of doctrinal underpinning and preclusive effect on federal jurisdiction? [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
City and County of San Francisco (1st—A165231) Workers’ Compensation Exclusive Remedy Rule—Public Employers—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s judgment of dismissal in favor of defendants, held that plaintiff firefighter employed by San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) was barred by workers’ compensation exclusive remedy rule in Labor Code §§ 3600(a), 3601(a) and 3602(a) from pursuing personal… [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 7:17 am by Miriam Seifter
City and County of San Francisco, that statute incorporates rules of issue and claim preclusion, such that parties generally cannot relitigate in federal court issues already decided in state court. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1012. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am by Arthur F. Coon
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:50 am
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005) since it produces absurd results and denies federal court review of federal constitutional rights. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:12 pm
  His counterpart at BASF was Christine Van Aken of the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:28 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 125 S.Ct. 2491 (2005). [read post]