Search for: "City of Sacramento v. State of California"
Results 81 - 100
of 248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
The California Court of Appeal, in Horsford v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm
Placerville Historic Preservation League v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
While in the Windy City, the justice also presented the Martin D. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:14 pm
(City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:14 pm
(City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am
” (Quoting California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am
” (Quoting California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:16 pm
3-Car Accident near South Lake Tahoe I’m Ed Smith and I’m a South Lake Tahoe Auto Accident Attorney. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am
On May 2, Justice Anthony Kennedy spoke to Sacramento business leaders and lawmakers who had come from Kennedy’s hometown in California to Washington as part of the Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce’s “Capitol-to-Capitol” program. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:20 am
National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm
On February 15, 2017, the California Supreme Court denied numerous requests for depublication and declined to review on its own motion the decision in East Sacramento Partnership for a Livable City v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
In light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 833, 851-852), the Court also acknowledged that “[t]he distinction between elements of a project and measures designed to mitigate impacts of the project may not always be clear” (quoting Lotus v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
East Sacramento Partnership for a Livable City v. [read post]