Search for: "Clarence Thomas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,730
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 6:51 am
Ferguson, No. 22–942, Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Ideally, the Court would simply reverse the U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm
” Justice Clarence Thomas would not have dismissed the case on the ground that the case was moot, noting that the hotel had spent “significant time and resources fully briefing a question that will now go unanswered” and observing that “the circumstances strongly suggest strategic behavior on Laufer’s part” in dismissing the case in the lower court. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm
” Justice Clarence Thomas asked whether Congress could tax an increase in the value of real estate, while Justice Neil Gorsuch asked about the possibility of a tax on retirement investment accounts, which millions of Americans hold. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:04 am
Justices Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson issued opinions concurring in the judgment. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:16 am
U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Staab, Limits of Constraint: The Originalist Jurisprudence of Hugo Black, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas (2022). 4. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm
That prompted the Department of Justice to come to the Supreme Court in August, seeking to have the implementation of the plan put on hold to give the Supreme Court time to weigh in. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
Just last week, Justice Clarence Thomas authored what appears to be the first ever opinion (a dissent from the denial of review) on the question of the propriety of preclusion in the context of another procedural vehicle that has been repurposed in modern times to serve as a method of mass aggregation and settlement — multidistrict litigation. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
But author Evan Thomas, in his 2019 biography of O’Connor, reported that in March 1952, after Rehnquist had left Stanford for a clerkship at the Supreme Court with Justice Robert Jackson, Rehnquist proposed to Sandra in a letter from Washington. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of certiorari, arguing that it “seems illogical and unfair” to relax the common-law requirement that collateral estoppel bind litigants in later litigation only when both parties are the same. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
The decision of the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch – two votes shy of the threshold needed for emergency relief – indicated that they would have granted the parents’ request. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:36 am
Abbott, No. 23–13, Justice Clarence Thomas issued an opinion dissenting from the denial of certiorari. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am
DuPont came to the Supreme Court this summer, asking the justices to weigh in. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:00 pm
” Unsurprisingly, the Code did not appease critics who have raised questions about recent revelations of Justice Clarence Thomas’s acceptance of extravagant largesse as well as other Justices’ questionable conduct.And for good reason. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:26 pm
Three justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch – indicated that they would have granted the state’s application, but they did not provide any explanation for their votes. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Democratic Plan to Subpoena Supreme Court Justices’ Allies Faces Pushback MSN – Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 11/8/2023 Democrats in Congress have tried unsuccessfully to press the Supreme Court to strengthen its ethics rules following revelations that some justices accepted and did not report free luxury travel, real estate deals, and gifts from wealthy benefactors. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
"When the Second Amendment's plain text covers an individual's conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his majority opinion in Bruen. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm
As Justice Clarence Thomas put it, “the statute defines a person as [including] any government or governmental subdivision or agency,” which seemed to him at least to “suggest that it applies to the U.S. [read post]
