Search for: "Clark v. District Court" Results 81 - 100 of 1,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2015, 8:25 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
Go, Florida’ Fifth District Court of Appeal (“Fifth DCA”) held that even in complex medical malpractice cases, the trial court has broad discretion to place limitations on expert witnesses. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 8:25 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
Go, Florida’ Fifth District Court of Appeal (“Fifth DCA”) held that even in complex medical malpractice cases, the trial court has broad discretion to place limitations on expert witnesses. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 10:25 am by Matt C. Bailey
On July 2, 2010, the Second District (Division 8) changed the status of its class settlement opinion in Munoz v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
District Court Judge referred Clark’s motion to suppress to a U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of Nevada issued in a case involving claims against a “school district and . . . employees of the" district. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:02 pm
District Court alleging multiple state and federal counts against then Police Commissioner Kevin Clark and other parties. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:31 pm by Howard Zimmerle
Clark is a criminal case, and is a Second District case, not Illinois Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:02 am by Samuel Franklin
[JURIST] The US District Court for the District of Utah [official website] struck down part of Utah's anti-bigamy law [statute, text] on Friday in the case of Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:02 am by Samuel Franklin
[JURIST] The US District Court for the District of Utah [official website] struck down part of Utah's anti-bigamy law [statute, text] on Friday in the case of Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 10:58 pm
Aaron Munter, May It Please The Justice: Justice Kennedy and School Desegregation after PICS, 12 Lewis & Clark Law Review 695 (2008) The 2007 Supreme Court decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:31 am
The district court found that the information should be redacted because it had been disclosed in open court. [read post]