Search for: "Class Member Objectors" Results 81 - 100 of 397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
We vacate the orders of the trial court and remand for further proceedings to correct the class definition to unambiguously state that indirect purchasers of new Seagate disc drives are members of the plaintiff class and to renotice the settlement in order to give adequate notice to all class members, and allow for additional claims, objections or opt outs. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Whether Defendants provided Individual Plaintiffs and the Class members with reasonable accommodation as required under FEHA and Title VII; and 5. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:23 am by Allison Zieve
Although some class members had already received individual notice of the proposed class action settlement, Sprint conceded that searching its records would identify millions of additional class members, who could then be sent notice. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:14 am by Lindsay C. Demaree
(Remaining class members who submitted claims stood to receive only $79.) [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:34 am
Pella opinion, Judge Posner described the acute conflict of interest between class counsel and class members in a class settlement compared to settlement of other cases. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Class Action Objectors – Are They Protectors of Absent Class Members or Merely Gadflies? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:02 pm
UPDATE: Here is a three-page letter decision of July 7, 2009 that rules on whether Geneva Trading USA, LLC, is eligible to be classified as a "Participating Group B Settlement Class Member", as so allows it. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:05 pm by Edward M. McNally
That is closer to a class action where the class members recover directly in any settlement. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:47 am by Brian Wolfman
So, if the class settles for $1 per class member, will the objectors howl "we sued for coupons, and all we got was the worthless buck!? [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 4:22 am
The main objection to the proposed class action settlement came from members of self-funded plans, several of which objected to class action certification and to the terms of the settlement, and sought leave to intervene. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:52 am by Peter Breslauer
As Judge Nguyen’s dissent saw it, the proponents of applying non-California law to class members outside California—here, objectors to the settlement—had the burden of establishing that individual state-law questions predominated. [read post]