Search for: "Colin v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
" White v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:05 pm
Several electors in each state did not to do so, voting instead for Colin Powell (WA) and John Kasich (CO). [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
American States Ins. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
April 29, 2019 Colins, J., Lazrus, J., Kunselman, J.) [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:23 am
The United States Supreme Court will hear Chiafalo v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
See also Llaurado v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
"The petitioner in the Washington case, Peter Chiafolo, was elected as a presidential elector when Hillary Clinton won that state’s popular vote in 2016 but voted for Colin Powell instead, which led to a $1,000 fine for violating a state law that required him to vote for the presidential and vice-presidential candidates who won the majority of the popular votes. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:24 am
Kai-chieh Chan, Álvarez y Marín Corporación and Others v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
In La Salle v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am
" Ray v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:36 am
Justice Birss states:32. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
” Briefly: At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that “[t]hree presidential electors in Washington state who voted for Colin Powell in 2016 rather than Hillary Clinton and were fined under state law are asking the US Supreme Court to take up their appeal and decide whether a state can bind an elector to vote for the state’s popular vote winner. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
Secretary of State, Colin Powell. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
