Search for: "Collins v. a T & T" Results 81 - 100 of 1,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by koherston
Collins (Tennessee Court of Appeals, Middle Section, April 19, 2012). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 11:44 am
  California disagrees.The panel opinion by Judge Collins holds that (1) the case isn't moot -- even though schools are no longer closed -- due to the "voluntary cessation" doctrine and the fact that schools might perhaps be closed again were COVID to flare back up; (2) the cessation of in-person instruction at public schools was fine, but (3) the order stopping in-person instruction at private schools was unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:24 am
By her own statement, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh conned her:After the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
Although the energy to do proper case comments has deserted me until tomorrow, I couldn’t resist this exchange, which is just about all that is reported of Bedi, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hounslow [2007] EWHC 3311 (Admin) MR JUSTICE COLLINS: Now, Mr Bedi, as we have discussed, and for the reasons I have indicated, I am afraid I am going to have to refuse permission. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:23 pm by Hunter Biederman
  Brady material requirements stem from the US Supreme Court case of Brady  v. [read post]
” Senator Collins specifically raised concerns about the erosion of precedent, saying, “[t]he Supreme Court’s recent abandonment of long standing precedent erodes the reproductive rights on which women have relied for half a century. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:49 am by Adam Feldman
Here is an example of a citation to a concession from Alito’s dissent in Collins v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:31 am
The court said a) no he didn’t, and b) no he didn’t. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]