Search for: "Com. v. Ables"
Results 81 - 100
of 434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
Could make the entire survey about .com terms, so all the educational section and examples would be about .com. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:30 am
” USPTO v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
V. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
Although the valuation of that domain is a little ridiculous, being able to have the right domain at the right time can in itself create a business opportunity and thus be very valuable. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
Although the valuation of that domain is a little ridiculous, being able to have the right domain at the right time can in itself create a business opportunity and thus be very valuable. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
Although the valuation of that domain is a little ridiculous, being able to have the right domain at the right time can in itself create a business opportunity and thus be very valuable. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
Although the valuation of that domain is a little ridiculous, being able to have the right domain at the right time can in itself create a business opportunity and thus be very valuable. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
He cites Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
In that case, the USPTO wants to apply a bright-line-rule that adding “.com” to a generic word does not create a protect-able mark. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Although some commenters worry that mark owners might be able to fo [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am
” However, permanent establishments created by Irish companies in France are likely not able to claim a “permanent establishment discrimination” because as a tax on t [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:57 am
Ross relied heavily on an 1888 Supreme Court decision, Goodyear’s India Rubber Glove v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
” (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:24 am
Booking.com – Whether the addition of “.com” to an otherwise generic term by an online business can create a protectable trademark. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
It will also mean that the hearing may be broadcast with members of the public able to dial in and watch or listen. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:20 pm
See Chatman v. [read post]
