Search for: "Com. v. Childs, T."
Results 81 - 100
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2012, 3:41 am
He fares no better with the argument that one of the child endangering convictions should have been thrown out for insufficient evidence, because one of the kids wasn’t his. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:39 am
That’s highlighted by a recent case I mentioned, Robbins v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:51 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:23 am
Doesn’t it make more sense to hold that if a judge fails to impose a fine, or a license suspension, that makes the sentence voidable, and if somebody appeals, you send it back and fix it, and if they don’t, you don’t? [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:21 am
In State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:34 am
” The 9th Circuit based its decision on Jackson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:15 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:34 am
Harris, the issue being whether Harris can be imprisoned for failing to pay child support. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Ormsby won’t supply the plotline for the next rom-com. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:57 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:42 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
You won’t find any more from the 2nd District; in State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:14 pm
(Needless to say, I didn't participate in the blackout.) [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 3:48 am
The best indication that Herring wasn’t intended to introduce a new rule is that just a few months later, in Arizona v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:45 am
In that case, the biological father, ordered to pay $1,000 a month in child support, instead provided a $125 gift card for Christmas and $60 in cash on the child’s birthday. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
That somebody could wind up being executed over something like this is something Franz Kafka couldn’t have dreamed of, and seven of the nine justices on the US Supreme Court agreed last week in Maples v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:36 am
A closer look While Schmitz reveled in the attention, it wasn’t long before TÜV was wondering what, exactly, it had bought. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:45 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
Dent, holding that police can’t rely on the inventory search exception where the defendant’s car is legally parked, and State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
Slaven strongly suggests that evidence of similar acts in child sex abuse cases might fall on the prejudicial side of that ledger. [read post]
