Search for: "Com. v. Crawford, S."
Results 81 - 100
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2012, 3:34 am
The question presented in State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am
I’m guessing that you’ve gone your entire legal career without having to know that, but it’s essential to understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in US v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
In the 9th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:33 am
There are probably lots of people sitting in prison because evidence was introduced against them that might have been prohibited by the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
Some cases wind up in the Supreme Court just because the law’s so damned goofy, and Evans v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
The result was dictated by last year’s decision in Williams v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Massachusetts - Crawford v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
France… It was a Crawford violation to allow the State to have a state trooper testify as to the urine results, rather than the toxicologist or lab technician who performed the test, the 4th District holds in State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:45 am
Illinois, the Court will consider whether there’s a Crawford violation when one witness testifies about the results of DNA testing performed by a different analyst. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am
That’s the issue tackled by the 2nd District in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
Hearsay is admissible in a hearing to revoke community control sanctions, but are testimonial statements barred by Crawford v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:34 am
 A spirit of togetherness also imbued the court's decision in State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:49 am
Massachusetts, the US Supreme Court held that the law violated Crawford v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 3:28 am
And let’s not leave out the civil cases: Hall v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:47 am
That’s one of the major decisions to be announced before the Court’s term ends in two weeks; others include the application of Crawford to lab reports and the student strip-search. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
Massachusetts: is a “notice and demand statute” — a statute giving notice to a drug defendant of a chemist’s analysis of the drug, with an advisement that the analyst’s report will be admissible unless the defendant demands live testimony — consistent with the Confrontation Clause as defined by Crawford v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
There are still several key cases which were argued last fall, and could come out at any time, including the one involving the FCC’s “fleeting expletives policy,” discussed here, and the case concerning whether Crawford v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:50 am
” The opinion cites the 10th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
