Search for: "Com. v. Downing" Results 81 - 100 of 943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 3:50 am
  It seems the liquor was flowing more frequently down at the old Lakeside Courthouse last week, because as I’m reading the 8th’s opinion in State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Nothing going on down in Columbus, so let’s head over to the courts of appeals… A judgment of conviction must included disposition of the forfeiture specifications, says the 8th District in State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:50 am by Amy Roper
  On June 8, 2017, the European Commission published a communication on the mid-term review of the capital markets union (“CMU“) action plan (COM(2017) 292). [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
The decision in Greenspan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  Last week, the Ohio Supreme Court handed down its decision in Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:37 pm by Bill Araiza
From the Religion Clause blog (via my co-author Tom Baker) coms news of Nieto v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:36 am
Casalicchio, holding that failure to impose PRC rendered the sentence voidable, only to see the Supreme Court come down not a week later in State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  That all came crashing down when the Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Massimiliano Di Martino
In its Judgment in Case C-235/09 DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA the European Court of Justice ruled that the Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community Trade Mark (the Regulation) creates Community arrangements for trademarks whereby undertakings may obtain Community trademarks to which uniform protection is given and which produce their effects throughout the entire area of the European Union. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  Future generations will probably not be debating the consequences of the two decisions handed down this past week. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  The 2nd District rejects the State’s argument that separate convictions could be supported by the defendant’s having grabbed and tried to stuff a scarf down her throat, and then pushed her down on the bed and held a pillow over her face; the court found this “blow-by-blow” analysis was rejected by State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
  In State v. [read post]