Search for: "Com. v. Downing (Complete Opinion)"
Results 81 - 100
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 3:33 am
The opinion effectively counters the point of counsel not having time to argue the elements; as the court rightly notes, “the state’s success on proving the elements came down to whether the jury believed the victim,” so arguing the elements wouldn’t have made any difference. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:20 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:47 am
In FTC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:36 am
A couple of months back, I wrote a post about State v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:41 am
And last week, in State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
Barrett points out the influence of Professor Robert Cushman on Justice Elena Kagan’s dissenting opinion in Seila Law v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Two weeks ago the 8th District decided in State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:35 am
Two weeks ago the 8th District decided in State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
With regard to Europol, Regulation (EU) 2016/794 (hereinafter: initial Europol Regulation) lays down both the rules for data protection applicable to Europol and the supervisory tasks of the EDPS. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
Here is the complete decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:51 pm
Where the United States has descended into data driven closed circles of opinion generation-response-opinion generation (a perverse version of the Chinese mass line applied by the American privatized vanguard parties), Brazil remains true to its imperial past, and its imperial dependencies. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:46 pm
" Utter and complete nonsense. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
The panel opinion, which was issued in the name of only two justices (Lang and Brown) because the third one on the panel (FitzGerald) had resigned before it was handed down on July 31, 2015. [read post]
29 May 2022, 8:42 am
Note: an expert witness’s testimony is an opinion. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
The panel opinion, which was issued in the name of only two justices (Lang and Brown) because the third one on the panel (FitzGerald) had resigned before it was handed down on July 31, 2015. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
Alaska Public Offices Com'n v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:45 am
Again http://t.co/y0unOiUO3M -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-07-06: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-28: Com… http://t.co/68wn0271oo -> Crass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension — Rosario v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Com. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Newsom aims to have environmental review completed by early 2022. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(IPKat) AG’s opinion in L’Oreal v Bellure: unfair advantage aspects; IBIL seminar materials online (IPKat) Forthcoming attractions at the ECJ (IPKat) ISP liability, copyright term extension key IP issues for Europe this year (Intellectual Property Watch) Extension of copyright on audio recordings from 50 to 95 years passed through Legal Affairs Committee (TorrentFreak) (Managing Intellectual Property) EU, not content to double music copyrights, now looks to… [read post]
