Search for: "Com. v. Good, C."
Results 81 - 100
of 284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Lexis 84, at *20 (quoting Wenrick v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 pm
C. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:38 am
It’s not clear that Steinfurth made this precise argument, but it’s pretty clear that it wouldn’t have done him any good if he had; in State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
” And if you get that result, you’ve done a very good job of damage control. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Yet there are good reasons to question this interpretation. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:31 am
In State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:36 am
(In Franks v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am
I think a pretty good argument could’ve been advanced that these mirror RC 2929.12: whether the crime is more or less serious (divisions (B) and (C)) concern the offenses, and the recidivism factors ((D) and (E)) concern the offender. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:56 am
C. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:04 am
By Eric Goldman Goforit Entertainment LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 2:16 am
In an early ACPA case, Cello Holdings, L.L.C. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:07 am
& COM. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:41 am
Back in June, in US v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
Also doesn’t matter if a word is considered generic for the relevant goods or services, or for some other goods or services, in certain jurisdictions. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
Brazil-The Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro has finally ruled in the case of BMW v EEA and Com. de Veículos Ltda (here), a process that began in 2012, when BMW sued two Chinese distributors under the Brazilian unfair competition law for commercializing the Lifan 320 model vehicle. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:24 pm
New York Yankees Partnership v. [read post]
