Search for: "Com. v. Good, R." Results 81 - 100 of 298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am by Woodrow Pollack
§295) to prevent people from deceiving the public into believing their goods were patented. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:34 am
Snyder, R-Stuart. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
Also the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 18 July 2006 Case R 338/2006-2, DNI Holdings, Ltd for the mark SPORTSBETTING.COM 35.8 Use of Geographical Limitations to overcome objections As goods travel, the actual geographical origin of the goods is not always apparent. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm by Kirk Jenkins
(Note: The following post was originally published on Law360.com on January 15, 2013. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
”11 Nokia even noted that Qualcomm’s actions “induced third parties to invest in the implementation of that standard in good faith reliance upon Qualcomm’s commitments. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm by Giles Peaker
 Also good to see the unproblematic application of the Simmons v Castle uplift. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm by Giles Peaker
 Also good to see the unproblematic application of the Simmons v Castle uplift. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by David Lat
DiDonato’s twitter account:http://0cfa9f600839f57e90e5559b8ee54864.com/eddied10/A couple of choice tweets:“Got threatened to have my number blocked, crept on numerous ladies, woke up naked…it was a good night”“wow blacked out at the white out and i couldnt be happier”“I’m drinking harder than I did in college…what’s wrong with me? [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:32 am by Russ Bensing
And the even bigger question in the 9th District’s decision in State v. [read post]