Search for: "Comcast Cable Corp." Results 81 - 100 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm by Jeffrey May
The Senate Judiciary Committee’s antitrust, competitive policy, and consumer rights subcommittee held a hearing on March 21, at which the legislators grilled representatives of Verizon Communications, Inc., and Comcast Corp., about the plans of four cable companies to sell spectrum to Verizon Wireless and enter separate marketing agreements between the parties. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:14 am by Heidi Henson
The case, Comcast Corp v Behrend (Docket No 11-864), involved an antitrust suit filed against Comcast Corp by a group of cable customers. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:35 am by Howard Ullman
Comcast Corp., 655 F.3d 182 (3d Cir. 2011), Comcast challenged a decision certifying a class of cable TV subscribers. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:01 pm by Nathaniel Grow
" Complaint at Paragraph 8.The plaintiffs also seek to avoid application of the antitrust exemption by citing to Henderson Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:04 pm by Michael Froomkin
Because really, as Verizon and the cable MSOs said in their response, what one mega-corp says to four of its largest competitors is really no one’s business. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:54 pm
Supporters for TV Everywhere, which include Time Warner Cable and Comcast, insist that the new platform is a solution to subscription-based services like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm by Jeffrey May
A consent decree resolved antitrust concerns with the combination of Comcast—the nation’s largest cable operator and Internet service provider—and NBC Universal’s cable networks, filmed entertainment, and television programming (2011-2 Trade Cases ¶77,585). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Comcast Corp., 705 F.Supp.2d 441 (E.D.Pa.2010), in which claims filed by state attorneys general were deemed to be subject to CAFA. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Comcast Corp., 705 F.Supp.2d 441 (E.D.Pa.2010), in which claims filed by state attorneys general were deemed to be subject to CAFA.  [read post]