Search for: "Comcast Corp. v. Behrend" Results 81 - 100 of 274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2014, 6:28 am by Joy Waltemath
The Ninth Circuit panel went on to explain that after Dukes and Comcast Corp. v Behrend, which expanded on the notion of individualized determinations and due process, circuit courts have consistently held that “statistical sampling and representative testimony are acceptable ways to determine liability so long as the use of these techniques is not expanded into the realm of damages. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm by Wystan Ackerman
How Harm to the Class Affects Predominance:  Brian Murray of Jones Day spoke about how courts are applying the Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 11:43 am
Analyzing the Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:28 am
In discussing Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement, the court also engaged in a lengthy analysis of the plaintiff’s damages models, stating that, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:54 am by Joy Waltemath
As to Pep Boys’ argument that the employees could not offer a method of measuring damages that could be applied class wide, as required by the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v Behrend, the court noted that the Ninth Circuit has clarified that individualized damage calculations alone cannot defeat class certification. [read post]