Search for: "Commercial Cable Company v. the United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm
” Defendants would be permitted to petition the United States for permission to continue to participate in the JOE. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:41 am
Your cable contract? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:04 pm
See Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound et al., v. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
The PCC upheld a complaint against the Telegraph following its undercover sting on Vince Cable in December 2010. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
However, we appreciate the fact that radio broadcasting is stillin a chaotic and experimental state and that, while ultimately it will have to be placed on a commercial basis if it is to develop its potentialities, nevertheless the commercial side of the broadcasting problem has not yet been solved. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:15 am
When the cellular phone emerged as a consumer product in the 1980s, it operated in 800 MHz frequencies, for which the FCC initially gave away two licenses for 40 MHz of spectrum in each of the 306 market areas in the United States – one to a wireless provider and one to a wired provider. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:43 am
Companies import decoder cards from abroad, in the present proceedings from Greece, into the United Kingdom and offer them to pubs at more favourable prices than the broadcaster in that State. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
WikiLeaks US embassy cables: live updates. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
CDL (Commercial Driver's License) License which authorizes an individual to operate commercial motor vehicles and buses over 26,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:20 am
While many political movements in the United States have effectively harnessed cyberspace for their immediate purposes, the 'Net itself uniquely eludes the goals of reformers and incumbents alike. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat) United States US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
In the 2004 decision, McConnell v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Often it has been considered a “loss leader” for media companies and has been cross-subsidized by other types of content or services.[4] This is why “bundling” has been such a popular model for many media operations such as newspapers, magazines, and cable television. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am
Stapleton of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:48 pm
China and Google v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
From 1979-2009, total license fees paid by cable & satellite companies to support C-SPAN totaled $922 million. [read post]
