Search for: "Commonwealth v. Christopher" Results 81 - 100 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
On June 24, 2009, Officers Christopher Morgan and Richard Diaz were in the Hyde Square neighborhood of the Jamaica Plain section of Boston. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:13 am by Daithí
(Apparently Godfrey v Demon is the leading case. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:58 pm by Christopher Bird
The best example of this in American caselaw is Harper & Row v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Lawrence Solum
Thro (Christopher Newport University) has posted Judicial Humility: The Enduring Legacy of Rose v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:59 pm by cdw
” [via Supreme Court of Washington Blog] Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Adam Wagner
Ornella Saibene, Robert Nicholls, Thomas Woodhead, Christopher ? [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
  The Commonwealth therefore has failed to make the necessary showing to warrant mandamus relief. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am by @ErikJHeels
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
Article on the Interaction of Choice of Law Rules and the Australian Constitution Christopher Kourakis, the Solicitor-General for the State of South Australia,... [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency and the Commonwealth of Virginia. [read post]