Search for: "Commonwealth v. May" Results 81 - 100 of 3,464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Sara Notario
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
Whilst the offence only applies directly to ‘large’ organisations, we expect that in practice, smaller organisations will still have to consider putting in place, or reinforcing, their anti-fraud procedures – given that they may be the ‘associated person’ of a large organisation (and the large organisation may therefore require them to have in place ‘reasonable procedures’ to prevent fraud). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am by Frank Cranmer
He referred to Rev Charles Odeke Akunya v Registered Trustees of Church of Uganda (HCCS No 305 of 2020) and Rev Canon Cyrus Adiga Nakari v Rt Rev Sabino Ocan Odoki (HCSS No 2 of 2017) and cited Justice Mubiru: “… the courts may refrain from adjudicating purely religious matters, save where the right to property or to an office depends on the questions as to religious faith, belief, doctrine or creed as the courts may be handicapped to enter into the… [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am by David Pocklington
There are no graves identified as war graves by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission [10]. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
Third, a statute may override a specified lex causae as a mandatory law of the forum. [read post]
In a welcomed statement made at the time of publishing this briefing, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office confirmed that it was carefully considering the judgment and the extent to which it may seek to clarify the position on this issue. [read post]