Search for: "Commonwealth v. Means (Dissenting Opinion)" Results 81 - 100 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Three justices (you need four for an outright majority) agreed in a concurring opinion in Phillips v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Peter W. Martin
(By parentage I mean the ultimate source of the opinion texts it offers, not the intermediary from which the database host may have acquired them in digital form or the citation data it may have added to them.) [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm by Sasha Volokh
(You can find a very brief concurring opinion here, and a dissenting opinion here.) [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm by Paul A. Prados
Early this afternoon the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals declared the individual mandate of the PPACA unconstitutional in a 2-1 decision.The case, Florida v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by David Cruz
  Many on the Court have long been committed to the First Amendment’s protection of dissent, and prosecutions under the flag-burning statutes around the country were clearly about suppressing dissenting expression using means that many found offensive. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
To make things more confusing, Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion reversing course, while Justice O’Connor (actually, Chief Justice O’Connor) wrote the dissent – just not the ones you think. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
Carr, Thapar dissented from an opinion suppressing evidence found after police officers blocked a suspect’s exit from a car wash and then found drugs and a gun in the suspect’s vehicle. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, then vacated the opinion of the panel and reheard the case. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Jefferson has said in his inaugural speech, that “error of opinion might be tolerated, when reason was left free to combat it. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
The First Circuit’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:59 am by Bexis
Aug. 28, 2009) (parents entered into secret release, and then hid it during discovery).The Dorel opinion at No. 3740472 addressed with a plethora of "in limine" (that means evidentiary matters presented before trial) motions. [read post]