Search for: "Commonwealth v. Stills, M."
Results 81 - 100
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
But in 1755, Washington’s marriage to Martha was still four years away. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
And if that dream is still just a little modest for you, how about if the government disavows the position it took below? [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
VI, § 6 (adopting the common law generally); Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm
Who’s responsible for that first draft, you may be asking, and since I looked it up, I’m going to tell you regardless. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
I therefore thought I'd blog the text of the draft brief here, and invite all of you to tell me why I'm wrong altogether, why I'm wrong on specific details, how the proposal could be improved, or even what parts of the proposal seem likely to be confusing to the judges. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
Still need to look at less restrictive means. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:42 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Section 8371.The Supreme Court adopted the two-part test enunciated in the case of Terletsky v. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:20 am
The leading recent case in Kentucky is Jones v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
But even with the drop in consumption, our revenue projections still cover the programs. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 6:13 am
In any event, I’m not sure this is a critical distinction. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:45 am
Now, here’s what happened in Pearson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:18 am
Cohen v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:18 am
Cohen v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Michelle Meyer, Geisinger Health System, (Still) Waiting to Exhale: Why the Future of Biospecimens Research Remains Unclear after the Final RuleMark Rothstein, University of Louisville School of Medicine, International Health ResearchNicolas Terry, Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
Justice Brewer’s 1892 decision is still studied for the “familiar rule that a thing may be within the letter of the statute and yet not within the statute, because not within its spirit nor within the intention of its makers. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:23 am
Although that federal case is still pending, the Florida Court of Appeals (Second District) has handed down a new decision, State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:32 pm
USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244 (1994), and adopted by this court in Commonwealth Edison Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:32 pm
USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244 (1994), and adopted by this court in Commonwealth Edison Co. v. [read post]
