Search for: "Communication Workers v. At&t Tech" Results 81 - 100 of 197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Tries to address 1A issues including US v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Bowden v KSMC Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Hubba Bubba Childcare on Haig & Chapman [2019] NSWDC 98 the plaintiff childcare worker was awarded $238,000 damages for a defamatory email sent by his employer. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:16 am by Blake E. Reid
Brophy, that doesn’t address that issue specifically, and the only other appellate case I can find that raises the question, Riaboff v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Concealed carry has been allowed at Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO) since 2003 and at Blue Ridge Community College (Weyers Cave, VA) since 1995. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Has to do with tech change, networking of users, state of © reform, and particular political activists like Michael Geist mobilizing a user community base. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am by Eric Goldman
It’s about time the USTR started thinking about foreign trade barriers to our domestic tech community. * Science: U.S. charges drug researchers with sending trade secrets to China, but will case stand up? [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 7:44 am by Eric Goldman
Salesforce * Latest Linkwrap on FOSTA’s Aftermath * Section 230 Doesn’t End Lawsuit Claiming Facebook Facilitated Sex Trafficking–Doe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:32 am by INFORRM
The Regulator also reported on the conviction of a former housing worker for data protection offences. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am by Marvin Ammori
One of Canada's largest phone companies, Telus, blocked a website run by a member of the Telecommunications Workers Union-during a workers strike by that union against Telus. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[130] But such a reduction in unfettered control wasn't seen as by itself posing a serious First Amendment problem: Turner rejected cable operators' "editorial control" claims as an argument for strict scrutiny[131]—and when it applied intermediate scrutiny, it didn't view the interference with editorial control as a basis for potentially invalidating the statute.[132] Nothing in the recent Janus v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Fanworks provide incredible benefits in literacy, sexuality education, language learning, community building, and other good things that come from making something you love and sharing it with other people who might just love it too.On the content v. tech distinction that Maria Strong made: we consider ourselves content folks who use tech. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
AT&T’s press release can be found here. [read post]