Search for: "Condon v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2022, 8:30 am by Russell Knight
“[F]raud will not be presumed in this State and must be proved by clear and convincing evidence” Hofmann v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Steyn J found that Vardy had used her agent Caroline Watt as an accomplice to leak the posts and that she condoned and actively engaged in the leaks. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 12:16 pm by MEL
The Commission further stated that while the Code prohibits discrimination based on creed, personal preferences or singular beliefs do not amount to one’s creed for the purposes of receiving protection under the Code. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:42 am by Eric Goldman
While we certainly do not condone defendant’s actions, his “taking” of the images is not an offense under the statute. * State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 5:03 am by Anoush Baghdassarian
Glorified, rewarded, and condoned acts of racism against and inhumane treatment of Armenians (Articles 2, 4, and 5(b)). [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Legal rights are therefore ephemeral, as we know from the likely imminent demise of Roe v. [read post]