Search for: "Cooper v. Roberts et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
New Director of Enforcement Division and More Changes In February, Chairman Schapiro announced the appointment of Robert Khuzami, a former federal prosecutor and investment bank general counsel, as the new Director of the Division of Enforcement. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG) Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local… [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:36 pm
Guttenberg, et al., C.A. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
Nikola Šainović et al., Case No. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Blom- Cooper et al (eds), The Judicial House of Lords: 1876–2009 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 629, 652 (‘The Law itself is compromised if a cynical or ‘realist’ view is allowed to take hold’). 5 McBride, n 4 above, 432. 6 J.C.P. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Roberts, et al., Respondents, vTishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Stahl and Robert A. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
Cooper, Timothy M. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
& Econ. 325-363 (2011).INTERNATIONAL LAW.Percival, Robert V. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
Some of that ridicule is certainly deserved, but the prospect of change in consciousness, aimed at creating an environment of understanding and cooperation (across valid differences of opinion) was not a foolhardy idea, then or now. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
, Vázquez-Salceda et al. (2008)). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
§ 1011 et seq., with regard to plaintiffs bringing tort claims for exposure to radioactivity. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
L. 807-811 (2011).Thomas, Seth M., et al. 2009-2010 environmental law survey. 44 Ind. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
