Search for: "Cooper v. State of Indiana" Results 81 - 100 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
Three Rivers Electrical Cooperative, Inc., 26 S.W.3d 151, 160 (Mo. 2000); Boyette v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Moreover, the agency cited its own administrative action in In the Matter of Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc. to explain how intent can be inferred from certain market-impacting behaviors.The CFTC then turned to DRW’s legal theories, which the agency argued were too subjective and, if adopted by the court, could cast aside long-held understandings of the Commodity Exchange Act’s anti-manipulation provisions. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Cooper, 18-877, involves whether Congress has the constitutional authority to abrogate state sovereign immunity for copyright infringement. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:10 am
California (08-897). ** A challenge to the constitutionality of laws in Indiana and other states that bar a winery — out-of-state or in-state — from selling or shipping wine directly to residents unless the buyer has had one face-to-face meeting with the winery to identify himself or herself. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:45 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Ohio, Indiana, and West Virginia filed suit, arguing that EPA’s rulemaking process circumvented the Clean Air Act’s cooperative-federalism mandate by forcing its own top-down control over state-level air-pollution reduction, and moved to stay the federal plan pending judicial review. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
: A Critique of Legalization Within the State Under the Premises of Globalization," Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 24(1):115-146 (2017). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting a petition filed by a class of some 800 current and former workers employed at a Gary, Indiana, U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Heather McCabe, Indiana University School of Social Work, Reviewing the Reviews: What are they learning through interprofessional education? [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 Among these states, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin expressly allow recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to statute. [read post]