Search for: "Cornell Stephens"
Results 81 - 100
of 474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2023, 12:19 pm
Stephen Yale-Loehr is professor of immigration law . [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:19 pm
“The forced separation of families during the Trump administration violated the due process rights of families,” Stephen Yale-Loehr , a professor of immigration practice at Cornell University School of Law, said. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
Gunisha Kaur , an associate professor of anesthesiology at Weill Cornell Medicine and medical director of the Weill Cornell Center for Human Rights ; Stephen Yale-Loehr , a professor of immigration law practice at Cornell Law School; and Jin K. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 10:00 am
Stephen Yale-Loehr, a professor of immigration law at Cornell University , predicted that if the Texas case makes it to the Supreme Court, the court would not issue a final ruling before June 2025. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:36 am
" "Any executive action that a president might try to end birthright citizenship would be challenged in court and would be likely struck down as unconstitutional," said Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration law professor at Cornell University . [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:44 pm
Bainbridge, Community and Statism: A Conservative Contractarian Critique of Progressive Corporate Law Scholarship, 82 Cornell L. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Cornell Bradley 14. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:04 pm
While it could be "sound to consider the context Professor Cornell referenced, the Court cannot discern how to incorporate that context into Bruen's mandated approach to analogical reasoning. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:50 am
Dale asked Cornell if his opinions now were based on Bruen. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:43 pm
From Stephen Yale-Loehr Professor of Immigration Law Practice, Cornell Law School: "Hi all: We have two great postdocs in our immigration law and policy research program at Cornell Law School. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
To be sure, some scholars these days (especially William Baude and Stephen Sachs) contend that originalism broadly understood is already the law. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
But, as Saul Cornell and Gerry Leonard have recently argued, America prior to the War never escaped the overall description of a “herrenvolk democracy. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
" Cornell is further cited for arguing that Heller was wrongly decided. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
Both Charles and Cornell are partisan historians who oppose Second Amendment rights in their writings and amicus briefs.. . . [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Both Charles and Cornell are partisan historians who oppose Second Amendment rights in their writings and amicus briefs. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
CNN stated that it was unlikely to pay for all its employees verification costs and author Stephen King voiced that he would leave Twitter if the plan goes ahead. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Consider Justice Stephen Breyer’s dissent from the decision striking down New York’s gun licensing law, in which he noted that there were in fact numerous examples of earlier similar laws. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
In 1978, the American Law Institute (ALI) authorized a project originally intended to result in a Restatement of corporate law.[1] The drafters intended their project to be a departure from traditional restatements.[2] As they visualized it, the project was to offer “a combination of classic Restatement, forward looking guidelines, and perhaps also model provisions. [read post]
