Search for: "Court Employees of Public Defender's Office"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
Defendants’ compliance department used scorecards to assess calls between employees and prospective students; the AG’s expert found relevant deceptive statements in over 20% of scorecards. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
The judge also defended her handling of the issue from special counsel Jack Smith, which had surprised legal experts and rankled prosecutors. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Diana Van Dyke, a public court reporter for decades and a board member of the Los Angeles County Court Reporters Assn., blamed judicial system mismanagement for driving employees into the private sector — starting with steep reporter layoffs during an economic downturn more than a decade ago. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:57 am
During 2023, the SEC also focused on individual accountability – charging individuals in more than two-thirds of its cases and barring 133 individuals from serving as officers and directors of public companies. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Legislation to classify these drivers as employees, AB5, was passed and affirmed after a court challenge. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Employee Fraud. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
The court found that CCDH’s actions, which constituted newsgathering and posting on X in connection with several public issues, were in line with their first amendment free speech rights. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
House Bill 227 would raise the gift ban limit to public officials and employees to $100 per occasion and $500 per year. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 5:10 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR World Central Kitchen (WCK) today called on the home countries of its employees who were killed in an Israeli airstrike this week to join it in “demanding an independent, third-party investigation” into the attack. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 3:02 pm
""After having reviewed the award with great care in light of the defendant's status as a public entity, we find the award appropriate to deter future unlawful conduct. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:31 am
The protests could indicate a turning point for the Israeli public. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:51 pm
The Supreme Court determined that a defendant that only offers a new expert witness opinion that differs from a prosecution expert witness’s opinion does not establish that the State’s expert witness testimony was false. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] District Court Judgment in 303 Creative v. Elenis (the Wedding Web Site Design Case)
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 pm
It is further ORDERED that defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those acting in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this order are permanently enjoined from enforcing: [a.] [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Supreme Court in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:53 am
Can the public watch? [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 pm
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not “constitute precedent or be binding upon any court. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 1:31 pm
" California courts recognize four categories of public policy cases: "the employee (1) refused to violate a statute; (2) performed a statutory obligation; (3) exercised a constitutional or statutory right or privilege; or (4) reported a statutory violation for the public's benefit. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 9:34 am
The trial court initially dismissed the claim but the Court of Appeals reversed and reinstated it, primarily on the ground that Blount’s statements, taken as a whole, conveyed factual assertions about Greene that disparaged her fitness to hold public office. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
* In addition, opined the Circuit Court, "To determine whether a public employee’s speech is protected, courts must decide “whether the employee spoke as a citizen on a matter of public concern"**. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
* In addition, opined the Circuit Court, "To determine whether a public employee’s speech is protected, courts must decide “whether the employee spoke as a citizen on a matter of public concern"**. [read post]
