Search for: "Crisp v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
Reminiscent of Hana Financial Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
Lady Hale identified two IP cases which stuck in the mind because of their real world applicability.The first was a case about gas burners (Sabaf v MFI [2004] UKHL 45 covered on the IPKat here) straightforward subject matter means it sticks in the mind - similar to the crisp packet problem she encountered in the Court of Appeal...Is it a sculpture? [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Crisp and clean. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:24 pm
With its decision in King v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:01 am
The City of Los Angeles, the State of California, indeed the United States of America had all been changed by his life, in ways both subtle and dramatic. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
’ United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm
From Corso Ventures LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am
Overall, Biskupic’s crisp biography lives up to its uniformly positive reviews. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am
But now the Supreme Court will have a chance to face the question squarely, in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:59 am
Maine Springs, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:32 am
Hearthware, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 9:13 am
That's been settled law at least since Tennessee v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:05 pm
Alito Jr. delivers a crisp summary of Limelight Networks Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
Justice Thomas with opinion in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:18 pm
California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Although the postal service has been declared a non-person, today’s decision cannot detract from the federal agency’s heartwarming role in the landmark case of State of New York v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:15 pm
Unsurprisingly (see my post-argument analysis), that pattern held true in today’s decision in Manuel v. [read post]
