Search for: "Cross. v. Church"
Results 81 - 100
of 703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2022, 7:01 am
The main reason is the widely held belief that the Supreme Court blessed the modern massive prior restraint system in the 1980 case Snepp v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 1:52 am
Hau: Personal involvement as a prerequisite for European tort jurisdiction at the centre of the plaintiff’s interests The case Mittelbayerischer Verlag KG v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Fois of counsel), for respondent/cross petitioner. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Fois of counsel), for respondent/cross petitioner. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:20 pm
Santa apparently managed to get himself into a spot of trouble here in Canada but a court decision wisely spared him: “Santa’s largesse got him in trouble in Community Fundraising Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
The plaintiffs got three free bites at the apple before the fourth crossed over the line; and it mattered that the copyright work at issue here–stickers for car consoles–is so clearly subject to minimal or no copyright protection that no one realistically should have thought the sticker design was copyrightable, despite the registrant’s earlier settlement with the second comer. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit: Depends if it's "akin to a criminal prosecution," which the district court didn't ask in this case about a church constructing unpermitted "structures" modeled after the Stations of the Cross. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm
Bruce Church (1970), the Supreme Court struck down an Arizona rule requiring cantaloupes that were grown in-state to be boxed in-state. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am
At trial, Holcombe’s lawyer cross-examined the co-defendants he also represented. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
In particular, I'll deal with three cross-cutting issues that often arise in these cases: [1.] [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 2:56 pm
(See, e.g., Cross v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
Smith and Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
Why Carefully Designed Public Vaccination Mandates Can—and Should—Withstand Constitutional Challenge
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
Henning Jacobson, the pastor of a local church, refused. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 9:03 am
In the most recent case of Vasilenko v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
Cuomo and South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
