Search for: "D & R General Contracting, LLC" Results 81 - 100 of 668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Thus, states may not apply generally applicable contract defenses in a way that "disfavors arbitration. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  These cut-off dates were generally thirty (30) or sixty (60) after policy expiration. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:31 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Having agreed that any dispute arising from the contract should be settled at the English court, the appellant was bound by the terms of the contract. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm
  In general, if two actions are pending in two different courts that concern the same general claims, the case filed first takes priority. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm by Ken Chan
If the new imposition of use tax collection duties is constitutional, then Amazon should pull its R&D centers from the State of California as well. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm by Ken Chan
If the new imposition of use tax collection duties is constitutional, then Amazon should pull its R&D centers from the State of California as well. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Peter Mahler
Scion Breckenridge Managing Member, LLC, 50 A.3d 434, 440-42 (DelCh 2012), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 2013 WL 1914714 (Del May 9, 2013). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am by Will Aitchison
Proficio Mortgage Ventures, LLC, 2011 WL 2417133 (D. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 4:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
The trouble is that many of not most D&O claims involve some sort of a transaction that includes some sort of a contract or agreement or understanding. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:58 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In rejecting the emotional distress claim, Judge Reiss noted that under New York law, emotion distress generally is not compensable in a breach of contract, and that no legal duty independent of the contract had been established. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Had he done so, he might have been able to provide his wife with the economic benefit of any distributions generated by the realty operations and 50% of the net profits on any sale of the properties. [read post]