Search for: "D. Frost" Results 81 - 100 of 373
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2019, 11:37 am by MOTP
CODE § 51.003(a) -- was void on public policy grounds, and that the summary judgment in the bank's favor should accordingly have been reversed.Dissent by Chief Justice Frost  The supreme court agreed with Chief Justice Frost's dissent to an extent. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:13 am by Kenan Farrell
Craig of Frost Brown Todd LLCDefendant: Edge Systems Group LLC d/b/a Electra Display Cause: Copyright Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, False AdvertisingCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Tanya Walton PrattReferred To: Doris L. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:48 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Frost, No. 18-0362/AR Issue: Whether the military judge erred in admitting hearsay statements as prior consistent statements under Mil.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B)(i) where the defense theory posited the improper influence or motive preceded the allegedly consistent statements. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Frost, in which the court held that a federal law bars the National Park Service from exercising regulatory control over the Nation River in Alaska because the river is not “public land” under the statute. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Frost, a unanimous court held that a federal law bars the National Park Service from exercising regulatory control over the Nation River in Alaska because the river is not “public land” under the statute. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
  If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast, or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” This blog’s analysis of Monday’s argument in Sturgeon v, Frost, in which the court considered whether the National Park Service can regulate activities on navigable waters within the national park system in Alaska, comes from Sandi Zellmer. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
Frost, revisiting the question of whether the National Park Service can regulate activities on navigable waters within the national park system in Alaska. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Sturgeon v, Frost, in which the court will revisit the question of whether the National Park Service can regulate activities on navigable waters within the national park system in Alaska. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 12:04 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As I detailed in a recent post, privacy issues are a growing area of corporate concern and a potentially significant area for emerging D&O claims. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Prior to the start of the Michaelmas legal term on 1 October 2018 we have collated some of the most significant developments over the previous two months. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am by MOTP
STATUTE OF FRAUDS IN THE ESTATE CODE [formerly PROBATE CODE]DOOMS CLAIM BY FORMER GIRLFRIEND WHO WAS CUT OUT OF THE WILL; -- PROMISE HELD UNENFORCEABLE   In re Estate of Jack C. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:50 am
’ Locating the Rights of the Chagos Islanders as a Case Study of the Operation of Human Rights Law in Colonial TerritoriesThomas D. [read post]