Search for: "D.J. Close"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 7:22 pm
The driver worked for D.J's Services of Forest Park, Georgia. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:43 pm
Tucker, No. 09-10319 (4-15-11) (Callahan with Gould and England, D.J., E.D. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:05 am
Oregon Board of Parole, No. 07-36086 (1-18-11)(Burns, D.J. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:15 pm
Roe, No. 06-56093 (11-30-10) (Paez with Pregerson and Mahan, D.J., D. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:55 pm
D.J. for DC; concurrence by Hug). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm
D.J., with O'Scannlain and Tallman). [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 12:34 pm
Begay, No. 09-10249 (9-20-10) (Bybee with Schroeder and Gonzalez, D.J.). [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
He became an outspoken critic of many of the university's policies, and the Second Circuit (Leval, Hall and Murtha [D.J.]) give us the laundry list. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Smith and Wolle, D.J.) upheld the police sneaking onto a driveway in the dead of night and placing a GPS tracking device on the car. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:06 am
The Court of Appeals (Kearse, Hall and Rakoff [D.J.]), reverses. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:17 pm
Graf, No. 07-50100 (7-7-10) (Tallman with O'Scannlain and Block, D.J.). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:11 am
In closing, the government argued that there was no evidence of threat. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm
Laurienti et al, No. 07-50240 (6-8-10) (Graber with Silverman and Scullin, D.J.). [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:03 am
The Court of Appeals (Lynch, Miner and Trager [D.J.]) says that claims like this are not implausible on their face. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 12:05 pm
., No. 07-56277 (4-12-10) (Trager, D.J., joined by Kleinfeld and Tallman). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm
IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF D.J., N.D.R., AND N.R., __ N.J. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
Qualified immunity is a creature of the federal civil rights laws; it gives public officials benefit of the doubt in close cases requiring discretionary judgment. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:44 pm
Fletcher with Kleinfeld and Duffy, D.J.). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
The Court of Appeals can hear interlocutory (or premature) appeals on qualified immunity grounds, but not if qualified immunity is denied on the basis of disputed facts as opposed to the defendant's argument that the law is sufficiently unclear that he gets the benefit of the doubt on close constitutional issues. [read post]
