Search for: "D.J.2"
Results 81 - 100
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2014, 8:50 am
Sorrell decided on July 2. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 6:49 am
The district court said this is not enough for a Title VII case, and the Court of Appeals (Walker, Sullivan and Vyskocil [D.J.]) affirms. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:33 am
On the mental health claim, the Court (Cabranes, Wesley and Sessions [D.J.]) says:the Officers had arguable probable cause to remove Arroyo from her home pursuant to MHL § 9.41. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:41 am
The district court granted plaintiff summary judgment in this case on her due process case, and the Court of Appeals (Calabresi, Pooler and Vilardo [D.J.]) affirms.Judge Calabresi tees up the analysis like this:The facts relevant to this appeal are largely undisputed. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Id. at *2. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:16 am
Factor 4 is inapplicable because DOL did not get involved, and factors 1 and 2 favor plaintiff, but only slightly. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 7:51 am
Valdavinos-Torres, No. 11-50529 (12-20-12) (Zouhary, D.J. [read post]
10 May 2015, 8:17 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
” Id. 2. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:22 am
Id. at *2. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 11:27 am
The Ninth concludes that the D.J. [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:15 am
Id. at *2. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:21 am
Id. at *2. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
Were these 2 dogs euthanized? [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:53 am
Sept. 2, 2010).In a patent/trademark case in which the district court made some seemingly bizarre trademark rulings, the Federal Circuit held that a trademark invalidity declaratory judgment cannot be dismissed for lack of an Article III case or controversy where the mark owner has actually sued the party seeking the D.J. for infringement. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 6:42 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:07 am
Fletcher and Walter, D.J.). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:17 pm
Graf, No. 07-50100 (7-7-10) (Tallman with O'Scannlain and Block, D.J.). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:24 am
§ 63-15-60(A)(2). [read post]
