Search for: "DAVID J. SULLIVAN" Results 81 - 100 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2019, 6:31 am
Collard, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, October 23, 2019 Tags: CFIUS, FIRRMA, International governance, Securities regulation, Treasury Department A Review of ISS Proposed 2020 Policy Changes Posted by Lisa Stimmell and Courtney Mathes, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Wednesday, October 23, 2019 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Institutional… [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Suppose that you are lucky enough to have health insurance through your employer. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:07 am by Derek T. Muller
Keller (Texas 2007 / Kozinski), partner at Baker BottsMisha Tseytlin (Georgetown 2006 / Kozinski / J. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 2:01 pm by Barbara Moreno
Mauet and David Marcus, Pretrial (2019). [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
David Koch Leaves Behind Legacy of Dark Money Political Network Roll Call – Kete Ackley | Published: 8/23/2019 David Koch, who helped pioneer a network of often surreptitious organizations aimed at influencing elections and public policy, leaves behind a legacy of “dark-money” groups and a volatile political landscape. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Do you include fiction on your legal history syllabi? [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 6:33 am
“Voidable” Posted by Gail Weinstein, Warren S. de Wied, and Andrew J. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Federal Inquiry of Trump Friend Focused on Foreign Lobbying MSN – Sharon LaFraniere, Maggie Haberman, William Rashbaum, Ben Protess, and David Kirkpatrick (New York Times) | Published: 7/28/2019 Federal prosecutors are investigating the role of Thomas Barrack, a top campaign fundraiser and close friend of President Trump, and his connections to the foreign lobby. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Yes, said an Ohio Court of Appeals majority opinion, reasoning that the speaker's past speech "was not engaged in for a legitimate reason, but instead for an illegitimate reason born out of a vendetta seeking to cause mental distress to his mother and sister and to exact personal revenge. [read post]