Search for: "DEPT. OF ENVIRON PROTECTION "
Results 81 - 100
of 213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
As a consequence, the societal expectations around business activity will likely shape more and more erode the effective protection of the principles of institutional and contract autonomy. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
Efficiency Improvements A New and Improved Environmental Checklist – The Final Text updates and reorganizes the environmental checklist (Appendix G) most agencies use to format and guide their environmental review.[4] The modifications to the checklist: Eliminate redundant questions so lead agencies are not required to repeat analysis in subparts of the same impact category; Add new transportation questions that focus lead agencies on evaluating impacts on VMT,[5] pursuant to requirements,… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 11:14 am
Attorney-Advisor, Branch of Environment and Lands, Washington DC. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
California Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Div., 4th Dept. 1996). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Div., 4th Dept. 1996). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Hickenlooper noted that these standards “will protect our quality of life in Colorado” and that “every move we make to safeguard our environment is a move in the right direction. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:28 pm
This was a sufficient reason supporting the village’s segmented review, the court found, and the village also sufficiently demonstrated that segmentation was no less protective of the environment. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:04 pm
” (In so holding, the Court distinguished the case of Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Exemptions Protect Telegraph Hill v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:54 pm
Auth., 61 A.D.3d 62 (1st Dept. 2009), so I wonder if this is the first time the Second Department has ruled this way. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:57 pm
All companies need robust anti-corruption measures and practices to protect their reputations and the interests of their stakeholders. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:51 am
No. 107-5, 115 Stat. 7 (Mar. 20, 2001) rescinded a Dept. of Labor ergonomics rule). [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:22 am
Dept. of Transp.That said, a filing with OSC is understood to be a constructive simultaneous filing with EEOC and vice versa. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:30 am
Visit the employee’s work environment/accident site. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 10:33 am
New Mexico Environment Dept., 733 F.3d 1283 (10th Cir. 2013). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
BAAQMD (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, holding that, as a general rule, CEQA does not require an effect of the existing environment on a project’s future occupants or users, the court held that BAAQMD’s receptor thresholds could not be used to evaluate effects on future users, because to do so could trigger the need to prepare an EIR solely because the emissions in the existing environment meet the thresholds as to future users. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:08 am
Dept. of Environ. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:57 pm
[that’s the case that held that even distribution of violent video games to children is protected-EV], 564 US 786, 790 [2011] [“(l)ike the protected books, plays, and movies that preceded them, video games communicate ideas …” and deserve First Amendment protection]). [read post]
