Search for: "DETROIT POLICE OFFICERS V CITY OF DETROIT"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
[see Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045]. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 1:52 pm
This lawsuit follows a Ninth Circuit decision upholding a civil rights lawsuit by a police officer who sued the city he worked for after his text messages sent from his city-issued phone were released, even though the text messages were "public records. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Accordingly, the Board dismissed the allegation that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) by calling the Charlotte police. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
o SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
§ 1983, alleging that on June 10, 1999, officers Wade and Breuer used excessive force in handcuffing and securing him during the execution of a search warrant at his business and that the city of Bristol, Tennessee, failed to train and supervise its officers. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
MI St Police Dept Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0540n.06 Salens v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Pro se § 1983 plaintiff Mark Allen Harper sued the defendant police officers, alleging that in 2003 they detained him and searched his residence in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
No charges have ever been filed against him in regard to the shooting.Parsons sued the City of Pontiac and a number of city police officers pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:18 am
Recently a reporter from the Detroit Free Press did a ride-along with Dicks as he patrolled his city on the lookout for immoral waistlines. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
No. 3538 and Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit et al. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
City of Detroit, No. 06-2441 In a case arising from an incident in which defendants-police officers opened fire on unarmed plaintiff in his own backyard, wounding him in the chest, allegedly without warning and without cause, denial of summary judgment for officers is affirmed over claims that: 1) one officer was entitled to qualified immunity because his shot missed plaintiff; and 2) second officer should receive qualified immunity… [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
§ 1983, against the City of Detroit and the two officers. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:50 am
City of Detroit, No. 05-1371, 05-1373In an action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 seeking damages from individual Detroit police officers for their alleged unconstitutional seizure and malicious prosecution of plaintiffs, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed as: 1) no reasonable juror could find that probable cause did not support one plaintiff's arrest; 2) plaintiffs failed to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding the… [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
City of Detroit, No. 05-1371, 05-1373In an action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 seeking damages from individual Detroit police officers for their alleged unconstitutional seizure and malicious prosecution of plaintiffs, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed as: 1) no reasonable juror could find that probable cause did not support one plaintiff's arrest; 2) plaintiffs failed to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding the… [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
§ 1983 seeking damages from individual Detroit police officers for their alleged unconstitutional seizure and malicious prosecution of the plaintiffs. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
Circuit (Detroit Newspaper Agency v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Detroit Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitCRIMINAL: SENTENCINGMcKinley, District Judge. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 5:25 pm
The drugs are then transported and delivered east to Detroit and other eastern cities. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
The plaintiff's complaint alleges that three Columbus police officers and the City of Columbus are liable for violating his constitutional rights, specifically the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable seizures and the use of excessive force. [read post]
