Search for: "DH v. People" Results 81 - 100 of 411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2022, 6:00 am by Ana Popovich
Then-DHS Deputy Secretary Ken Cuccinelli said at the time that the allegation is “‘clearly false and should never have been made in the first place…We take the health and welfare of even people we’re deporting very seriously,’” according to the article. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:57 am by Jennifer Lynch
While we are still waiting on rulings in two criminal cases involving geofence warrants: People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas stated that DHS’s actions illustrate its “ongoing commitment to Afghan nationals who provided valuable assistance to the United States over the past two decades. [read post]
The court also held that DACA failed the first step in Chevron USA v Natural Res. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm by Bill Marler
Napolitano, 628 F.Supp.2d 535,540 (S.D.N.Y 2009) (concluding the same and noting “DHS conceded this point at oral argument”); but see Brown v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:15 pm by Bill Marler
Napolitano, 628 F.Supp.2d 535,540 (S.D.N.Y 2009) (concluding the same and noting “DHS conceded this point at oral argument”); but see Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:38 pm by Amy Howe
The order cited the court’s 2020 ruling in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 11:56 am by Karen Gullo
Service Looked Through People’s Posts Prior to Street Protests Washington D.C. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Omar Khodor
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am by Peter Margulies
  While Hanen’s opinion follows established principles of administrative law and statutory interpretation in most respects, it is flawed in its failure to address an important residual source of discretion: DHS's ability, recognized by the Supreme Court in Reno v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]