Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 81 - 100
of 7,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2023, 3:56 am
I am not calling Kendi or Minhaj a sellout... [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:00 am
If the equipment you are using on the job was manufactured by company X and was the cause of your injuries, you can get workers’ comp while suing company X for any malfunctioning equipment. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:23 am
A: So you are looking for a theory that does X, and my theory blah blah blah and so on. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:40 am
As I mentioned on Tuesday, Mac OS X Snow Leopard will be released tomorrow. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:03 pm
[Double X] * The Anonymous Lawyer opines on Biglaw bonuses. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:22 pm
I was looking at the 2011 OJD Base Fines Instructions and Charts and the 8 x 10 color glossies with circles and arrows and the word U-TURNS caught my eye. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 1:08 am
As an ironic, contrarian, so-hip-it-hurts Gen X-er, I just can't love you anymore. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:09 pm
There may be required minimum distributions -- RMDs -- that you can seize, but that does not permit you to seize the entire IRA, or any distributions in excess of the RMD.)Now, I admit, things can get complicated here, since we don't know exactly what $X is in the present case. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:22 pm
The CJEU does not then say what distinctiveness the X mark does have, but the inference is that it is weak. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:02 pm
Here are my problems with the curve -- by which I mean a strict curve requiring x% As, x% A-, etc. all the way down to the lowest grades, and not something like a "target mean grade." [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:07 am
On route to establishing claims (A)-(E), I also argue (i) that when discussing (α), we should focus on the level of legal orders (legal systems), not on the level of individual legal norms, (ii) that the claim that law is necessarily normative is to be understood as the conceptual claim that necessarily, if x is a legal norm, x is normative, not as the essentialist claim that if x is a legal norm, x is necessarily normative, and (iii) that… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:07 am
On route to establishing claims (A)-(E), I also argue (i) that when discussing (α), we should focus on the level of legal orders (legal systems), not on the level of individual legal norms, (ii) that the claim that law is necessarily normative is to be understood as the conceptual claim that necessarily, if x is a legal norm, x is normative, not as the essentialist claim that if x is a legal norm, x is necessarily normative, and (iii) that… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 8:28 am
" I liked the article because it does a very good job explaining where China fits in the world right now, where it sees itself fitting, and where it is going. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 4:36 am
Still to date, the Turkish government does not recognize the Kurdish language, and, therefore, the letters Q, W, and X do not exist in any official Turkish capacity. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:12 am
If someone insults X by saying X looks like Y, both X and Y are insulted, and our well-established love for X does not save Y from the insult. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:36 am
What does an empty threat do to our credibility for future negotiations? [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:57 pm
The triage attendant does not deserve to be paid, nor the X-ray technician They took all of my insurance info and billing info before I ever got an xray. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
I. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
I like the fact that she reports what she is listening to and what she is reading as she does each portraits (WHYY and "The View From Castle Rock" by Alice Munro), and I like the way the project combines digital and plastic arts. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
If the statute says that I can't do X while Y, and I do X but not Y, I could see a legitimate complaint if they threw me in prison on the theory the statute should have said that you can't do X "or" Y. [read post]
