Search for: "DUKE v. ADAMS"
Results 81 - 100
of 192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Department of Justice (DOJ) The Value of M&A Drafting Posted by Adam Badawi (UC Berkeley), Elisabeth de Fontenay (Duke University) and Julian Nyarko (Stanford University) , on Thursday, March 23, 2023 Tags: clauses, Contracts, corporate deals, drafting, merger agreements, Mergers & acquisitions DOJ New Corporate Self-Disclosure Policy Posted by Sarah E. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Department of Justice (DOJ) The Value of M&A Drafting Posted by Adam Badawi (UC Berkeley), Elisabeth de Fontenay (Duke University) and Julian Nyarko (Stanford University) , on Thursday, March 23, 2023 Tags: clauses, Contracts, corporate deals, drafting, merger agreements, Mergers & acquisitions DOJ New Corporate Self-Disclosure Policy Posted by Sarah E. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Siegel is a Professor at Duke Law School. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
" Roberts, 42 Duke L. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 10:07 am
SES Concord Company; Adam Windows & Doors, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Young, U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
In Jackson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
In Flowers v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
On the same day, Tipples J handed down judgment on meaning in Adams v Associated Newspapers [2023] EWHC 1940 (KB). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
Dukes has “lived up to the hype,” as it has already been cited by lower courts 260 times. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Adam O. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Adam O. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times writes that the decision in Trump v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Sukenik & Adam J. [read post]