Search for: "Dan Kahan"
Results 81 - 100
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 6:56 am
In his empirical study of attitudes on rape, Professor Dan Kahan used the Berkowitz facts in part because they are such an iconic representation of some of the more difficult and troubling issues surrounding acquaintance rape. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:08 am
In his empirical study of attitudes on rape, Professor Dan Kahan used the Berkowitz facts in part because they are such an iconic representation of some of the more difficult and troubling issues surrounding acquaintance rape. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:56 am
In his empirical study of attitudes on rape, Professor Dan Kahan used the Berkowitz facts in part because they are such an iconic representation of some of the more difficult and troubling issues surrounding acquaintance rape. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:08 am
In his empirical study of attitudes on rape, Professor Dan Kahan used the Berkowitz facts in part because they are such an iconic representation of some of the more difficult and troubling issues surrounding acquaintance rape. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:06 pm
(Orin Kerr) Over at CoOp, Dave Hoffman points to a new paper, “They Saw a Protest”: Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction, by the folks at Yale’s Cultural Cognition Project — Dan Kahan, Dave, my colleague Don Braman, Danieli Evans, and Jeffrey Rachlinski. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:09 am
This paper, which just appeared in the SSRN Empirical & Experimental Journal, sheds some light on the cultural components of reasonableness in Supreme Court jurisprudence: Dan Kahan (Yale), Dave Hoffman (Temple), and Donald Braman (GWU Law), "Whose Eyes are You Going to Believe? [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 1:54 pm
Shortly afterwards I got an email from Dan Kahan, one of the academics involved, pointing me to work done by him and his colleagues on the Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 12:58 pm
Kahan, Hank Jenkins-Smith and Donald Braman. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:02 am
The slide from "Dan Kahan’s new magisterial HLR Forward, Neutral Principles, Motivated Cognition, and Some Problems for Constitutional Law" into the attack on Paul Campos' was nearly seamless, not because it was smooth, but because segues are for kids. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:38 pm
-- Howard mentioned the paper by my friends Dan Kahan, Dave Hoffman, and Don Braman, entitled: Whose Eyes are You Going to Believe? [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:59 pm
(For those unfamiliar with cultural cognition who want to learn more about it, check out Dan Kahan's excellent blog.) [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 2:29 pm
(See, e.g., an excellent essay by Dan Kahan.) [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 11:55 am
My main interlocutor in the academy on this topic has been Professor Dan Kahan, from Yale Law School. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 4:43 pm
Huang, and Michael Stocker each respond to Dan M. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:17 pm
Don is a member of the Cultural Cognition Project, and coauthor of various articles and papers investigating the effects of culture on law and policy, including Cultural Cognition and Public Policy (with Dan Kahan). [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 9:09 pm
Don is a member of the Cultural Cognition Project, and coauthor of various articles and papers investigating the effects of culture on law and policy, including Cultural Cognition and Public Policy (with Dan Kahan). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:07 pm
What is really going on, as I interpret it, is tribal politics, as described by (among others) Dan Kahan and Scott Alexander, both of whom I have linked to in the past. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:45 am
17 Oct 2006, 9:25 pm
Dan Kahan's article, to which this series of posts is responsive, can find it here. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:56 am
(This only exacerbates the problem identified by Don Braman, Dan Kahan and others that people choose the results that align with their prior beliefs rather than adjusting these beliefs in light of new data.)So what is the solution? [read post]
