Search for: "Daniel Epps"
Results 81 - 100
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2020, 7:36 am
Daniel Epps and William Ortman (Washington University in St. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:36 pm
Daniel Epps and William Ortman make the pitch for a Defender General in this forthcoming piece:The United States needs a Defender General—a public official charged with representing the collective interests of criminal defendants before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:51 am
4 Nov 2019, 9:30 am
Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman argue that it is. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 9:00 pm
Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman propose radical reforms to restore a moderate Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Referring to a forthcoming Yale Law Journal article by Professors Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman, Buttigieg explained their proposal, under which Congress would expand the size of the Supreme Court to include fifteen justices: five would be Republicans, five would be Democrats, and the remaining five would be chosen by the first ten from lower court judges. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
This time, he specifically called out a Yale Law Journal article by Daniel Epps of Washington University in St. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Wodehouse Art Hinshaw Artnegotiates Arizona State Negotiation Dispute Resolution Zachary Kramer zachary_kramer Arizona State Kris Mayes krismayes Arizona State Steve Clowney steveclowney Arkansas-Fayetteville Property Race & the Law Land Use Brian Gallini profcoachg Arkansas-Fayetteville Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Legal Education Stacy Leeds stacyleeds Arkansas-Fayetteville Property American Indian Law Legal Education Jill Lens… [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:38 am
’ - Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman The lottery would “de-politicize the appointments process,” Epps and Sitaraman wrote. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:39 am
(the corporation that publishes Scotusblog); and Daniel Epps and Ian Samuel, who at the time did the First Mondays podcast about the U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
Daniel Ortner argues at the Pacific Legal Foundation blog that “[a]lthough the facts of this case focus narrowly on public access television networks, the Supreme Court’s decision has significant implications for all property owners, the internet, and social media more specifically. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
Rev.) and Daniel Epps & Ganesh Sitaraman, How to Save the Supreme Court (forthcoming in Yale L.J.). [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:48 am
. ___ (forthcoming 2019), available at SSRN.Daniel Epps & Ganesh Sitaraman, How to Save the Supreme Court, 129 Yale L.J. ___ (forthcoming 2019), available at SSRN. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:30 am
Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman have outlined this proposal in a forthcoming Yale Law Journal piece. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
” At the Indiana Law Review, Daniel Coble reviews Joan Biskupic’s new biography of Chief Justice John Roberts, writing that “Biskupic’s ability to illuminate where Roberts has come from to where he is today gives the reader a head start to begin judging the judge. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Such a structure of decisionmaking, advanced by Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaranam as the “balanced bench,” would at least require justices of different parties to come together on a common project of self-governance. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
At Slate, Daniel Harawa urges the court to review the case of Charles Rhines, a gay death-row inmate who claims that a biased jury deprived him of a fair trial, “because, like racial bias, anti-gay bias should not have a place in the jury box. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 7:42 am
.'” You can access toady’s new installment of the “First Mondays” podcast, featuring Dan Epps, Leah Litman, and guest Danielle D’Onfro, via this link. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 5:40 am
.'” You can access today’s new installment of the “First Mondays” podcast, featuring Dan Epps and Danielle D’Onfro, via this link. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 5:07 am
Professors Dan Epps and Leah Litman catch you up on the court’s latest opinions; review the big batch of cert grants, as well as the high-profile petitions the court hasn’t (yet) granted; and play a few fun clips from last week’s arguments. [read post]
