Search for: "David A. v. Karen S."
Results 81 - 100
of 324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
(“Mazur CarP”), Karen Cashman (“Cashman”), and David Gallagher (“Gallagher”) move, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary judgment on their causes of action for accounting malpractice and breach of1:contract. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
J. 20 *** Michael V. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:55 am
David Sanger’s Times piece today recaps White House ruminations over whether to change the NSA’s collection activities under FISA. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 10:02 am
V. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson dissented. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bridge v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
According to that organization's head, Karen McNutt, Bay State paid Dowlut a "nominal sum" and his work was essentially pro bono. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:48 am
Jun 09, 2009) (NO. 395)Robert S. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 10:13 am
To view this Award, Karen Busch v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The Political Path to the Protection of Women’s Health Following Hobby Lobby During this election season, Washington State Democratic Senators Karen Keiser, Jeanne Kohl-Welles, David Frockt, Kevin Ranker, and Jamie Pedersen are promising to introduce legislation in 2015 that would ban discrimination against women in the provision of health care involving contraception. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
This is listed for 3 days Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) David v Hosany, heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
So here’s my plan. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Dept. of Transportation (No. 11-1219), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decided 2-1 to uphold the constitutional validity of a DOT rule that restricts how airlines can display a break down of how much of a passenger's airfare goes toward taxes and fees.Judge David S. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Dept. of Transportation (No. 11-1219), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decided 2-1 to uphold the constitutional validity of a DOT rule that restricts how airlines can display a break down of how much of a passenger's airfare goes toward taxes and fees.Judge David S. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:25 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (David M. [read post]
Dismantling Torts: Justice Stone's distress about Texas Supreme Court's Anti-plaintiff Jurisprudence
19 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
Pa. 2007) (discussing student's creation of a false MySpace profile of his high school principal); David L. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 8:03 pm
Following the Supreme Court's lead in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:11 pm
Anna Bower (June 14, 2023) A Primer on the Silent Witness Rule and United States v. [read post]
