Search for: "David Clinton v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
” On the second point, the authorization for committee staff to question witnesses is an exercise of Rule XI, clause 2(j)(2)(C) of the House rules, which states that committees may so authorize staff. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
As Justice Ginsburg wrote for a majority four years ago in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
In Baca v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:20 am
Clinton. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
More recently, the Clinton administration's Sandy Vershbow and Nelson Drew help to create the path leading to the Dayton Accords; Meghan O’Sullivan advocates for the Iraq surge in the George W. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The Constitution states that members of Congress—along with every state legislative official and every judicial and executive official of both the state and federal governments—“shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Judge Tatel indicates his view that this case is closer to Clinton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
The census citizenship question case (New York et al. v Dep't of Commerce, back in the SDNY after remand from the Supreme Court in June) has taken a strange new turn. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
And even if Steve Calabresi is correct, as discussed in an earlier post, that at present Democrats control six of the twelve smallest states, it is also demonstrably true that these states are increasingly unrepresentative of the rich pluralism and multi-culturalism that typify the larger states. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
The resolutions authorizing both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment proceedings granted the judiciary committee this authority. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
Meanwhile, a proposal to break up California into three states nearly made it onto the ballot last November. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
David Friedman (Israel) is a bankruptcy lawyer. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
In the 1992 and 1996 races, Ross Perot drained votes away from the major candidates, and twice denied Bill Clinton an overall popular majority of national votes. [read post]
