Search for: "David E. Sullivan" Results 81 - 100 of 350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Under the statute, Pamela Stark may not make any statements that "harass[], threaten[], assault[] or abus[e]" Joe Stark, and she may not "mak[e] disparaging remarks about" him to his employer. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Bernie Sanders Is Considering Several Options as He Ponders His Campaign’s Future MSN – Sean Sullivan (Washington Post) | Published: 3/21/2020 U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Frederick Schauer is David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal At the Bedraggled FEC, a Clean Slate of Leaders? [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 2:01 pm by Barbara Moreno
Mauet and David Marcus, Pretrial (2019). [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:38 am by Benjamin Wittes
Attorney for Having an Inappropriate Relationship with a Subordinate, Attempting to Influence or Impede an OIG Investigation, and Other Misconduct Findings of Misconduct by an FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge For Submitting False Travel Vouchers, Lacking Candor, and Other Misconduct In Connection With His Relocation Findings of Misconduct by an AUSA for Improperly Receiving, Viewing, Copying, and Sharing Personally Identifiable Information of Coworkers, and Lacking Candor with Supervisors… [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Do you include fiction on your legal history syllabi? [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm by Jon Levitan
More coverage comes from Robert Barnes and Ann E. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 6:32 am by David E. Bernstein
Andrew Sullivan, for example, recently portrayed a federal bill permitting states to refuse to deal with contractors who boycott those doing business with or in Israel entities as a bill that would have "made it illegal for any American to boycott goods from the West Bank, without suffering real economic consequences from their own government. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Yes, said an Ohio Court of Appeals majority opinion, reasoning that the speaker's past speech "was not engaged in for a legitimate reason, but instead for an illegitimate reason born out of a vendetta seeking to cause mental distress to his mother and sister and to exact personal revenge. [read post]