Search for: "Davis v. People"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:58 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm
Similarly, with respect to intent, Davis' prior simple possession of drugs was hardly relevant to his intent to distribute, since far more people use drugs than sell them. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
Davis, the extraordinary judge who presided over the ill fated October, 2007, first trial in Capitol Records v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
SMUG v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:09 am
” ECF No. 83-1 at 4.Davi v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm
I often recommend the people read particular opinions that are doctrinally complicated or that contain factually interesting material. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Davis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:51 pm
United States and Hill v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
Oscar Davies, a barrister at Lamb Chambers, and Jack Castle, a barrister at Henderson Chambers, offer their views on the Elan-Cane decision (R (On the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2021] UKSC 56) in this piece that first appeared in the New Law Journal. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Four years ago, in Davis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Yesterday in Miller v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 12:54 pm
In Capitol v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:36 pm
Southwire Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:55 am
The ruling in Tennessee v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:55 pm
Most people assumed yes, but the Supreme Court said no in 1976 in Washington v. [read post]
