Search for: "Davis v. Powers et al" Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The trial in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics was heard by Nicola Davies J on 23, 24 and 27 July 2018. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Malik Al Nasir claims he has been pressed to remove a reference in his work to Antoinette Sandbach. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The court held that the ordinance was a police-power regulatory action to which the categorical exemptions applied. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
Catherine Banet, et. al., eds., Resilience in Energy, Infrastructure, and Natural Resources Law:  Examining Legal Pathways for Sustainability in Times of Disruption (2022). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
It no longer needs to participate in standard democratic argument and discussion, rather it has exported its power. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics 1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor   Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and  Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment 1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William   On Conveyancers' Evidence 1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas   On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]